Home Blog Page 2

What a ‘Human-Centered’ Approach Can Do for Workers With Disabilities – Trending2days



In the summer of 2015, Katherine Macfarlane was preparing to teach at the University of Idaho’s law school. It was her first teaching job on a tenure track, and she wanted to make sure she had everything she needed. So she submitted a request for a keyboard tray and a few other office items.

Ms. Macfarlane gave the school’s human resources department a note that her doctor had written about four years earlier, describing her decades-long history with rheumatoid arthritis and recommending ergonomic office equipment. She also shared a radiology report that detailed joint damage and bone spurs.

It wasn’t enough: Her request was denied because the documents were deemed outdated, she recalled.

Instead, the department wanted her to provide a new doctor’s note — but the closest rheumatologist was about an hour and a half away, in Spokane, Wash. And it could take months before a specialist became available.

“I was panicking,” Ms. Macfarlane, 43, said. “So I pleaded with a rheumatologist I’d seen in the past and desperately asked for a letter.”

In August, her request was approved.

The lack of an item like a keyboard tray may seem like a minor inconvenience to some, but not to Ms. Macfarlane and millions of other people living with disabilities. The Americans With Disabilities Actwhich became law in 1990, bans discrimination against workers with disabilities and requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations that don’t pose an “undue hardship, a tricky term,

In reality, experts say, the process for obtaining accommodations at work is often filled with countless obstacles that dissuade disabled people from requesting them in the first place.

“There’s a huge gap between what the law was intended to do and what the experience of employees with disabilities really are,” said Ms. Macfarlane, who is the incoming director of the disability law and policy program at Syracuse University College of Law.

Experts argue that in order to be more accommodating to workers with disabilities, employers need to lift antiquated barriers such as medical documentation requirements and long wait times. Instead, employers should establish policies that are accessible to as many people as possible while being flexible and open to improvement.

The goal is for few people to have experiences like Ms. Macfarlane’s, and for employers to feel empowered, rather than intimidated, in their efforts to better accommodate workers.

Until this month, Amy Gong, 32, worked at Beaming Health, a company for children with disabilities and their families. (Her department was recently eliminated.) She has often successfully requested that her teams adopt tools such as noise-canceling headphones and note-taking plug-ins, without mentioning that she needs them for her autism and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

“I always try to make it a fun conversation for everyone, like, ‘I heard about this great thing or used it in a past job, maybe something the whole company can use,’” said Ms. Gong, who lives in a suburb near Los Angeles.

Providing doctors’ notes can be challenging for those who have just relocated, whose insurance may not have kicked in yet or who have not accrued enough paid time off.

“Employees are feeling hesitant and a sense of distrust with their employers because the process feels very clunky and very unsafe and insecure,” said Hannah Olson, 27, a co-founder and the chief executive of Discoa company that produces software designed to help people request accommodations without disclosing their disabilities to employers.

“The only reason there are documentation standards is because there’s this suspicion that disabled people are lying,” said Ms. Macfarlane, adding that disability laws do not require documentation.

Even if employers insist on documentation, they can simplify the process by accepting a variety of evidence, including older medical records, and requesting paperwork only once.

“Sometimes people need accommodations, or they don’t, or maybe they do, but need small adjustments,” said Beth Wiesendanger, 34, a double amputee and a senior manager of diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility at a technology company in New York. “Every conversation shouldn’t require documentation to be resubmitted all over again.”

Employers should also be more involved in theinteractive process,” a term used by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, during which both sides work together to determine what accommodations are most appropriate and helpful. Periodic check-ins are crucial.

But what happens after a worker requests an accommodation? It depends on the employer.

Despite legal obligations, employers are often hesitant to beef up their accommodations because of misconceptions that they are expensive and rarely needed. The median cost of an accommodation with a one-time expense is around $300, according to a recent survey by the Job Accommodation Network, and about half of employers reported that the accommodations they had established cost nothing. (Many accommodations, like remote work, also benefit nondisabled employees, including parents.)

Underlining the problem, many organizations do not have a standardized accommodation process or a centralized budget for it; often, they wait to address accessibility until an employee makes a request, said Shelby Seier, the founder of All Kindsa consulting firm that evaluates companies for accessibility.

“We often find that people come to us reactively rather than proactively, and they are scrambling to accommodate or figure out their legal obligations, or to rapidly adapt to an employee or group of employees that have identified access needs,” said Ms. Seier, 31, who has dysautonomia, a dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system.

There may be more disabled workers than employers realize. A median rate of 4.6 percent of employees in the United States are willing to identify that they have disabilities to their employers, according to the latest Disability Equality Index report by Disability:IN, a nonprofit advocating disability inclusion in business. But that is almost certainly a significant undercount of the total number: In a global surveys of nearly 28,000 workers published in May by Boston Consulting Group, around 25 percent of employees reported having a disability or health condition, whether visible or invisible. People with conditions that aren’t immediately apparent, like chronic migraines or dyslexia, may find it particularly challenging to request accommodations out of fear of not being believed.

Another reason for the gap is reluctance to share deeply personal medical information with managers. Some employees who might otherwise need accommodations decide to avoid a formal process altogether.

“It’s just a matter of whether they feel safe or not safe to disclose to you,” Ms. Wiesendanger said.

Companies tend to focus on compliance and risk mitigation, she noted, rather than a “more human-centered approach to accessibility.” To foster a workplace culture that values ​​disabled workers, employers can adopt practices such as hosting regular implicit-bias trainings, having a self-identification process without invasive questions and starting disability employee resource groups.

“Have an internal affinity group where you have individuals with disabilities talking with each other,” said Yvette Pegues, 45, the chief diversity officer of Your Invisible Disability Group and a board member for the Arc, a disability advocacy organization.

Other positive practices include encouraging workers to ask for what they need, providing easy-to-follow guides on how to request accommodations and constantly re-evaluating policies.

“Accessibility is a practice, not a destination,” Ms. Seier said.


Who Will Stand Up for Renters? Their Elected Representatives, Who Also Rent. – Trending2days



When Matt Haney entered the California Legislature, he discovered he was part of a tiny minority: a legislator who rents.

Mr. Haney has never owned property and, at 41 years old, has spent his adult life as a tenant. His primary residence is a one-bedroom apartment near downtown San Francisco. The rent is $3,258 a month. (He also paid a $300 deposit for Eddy and Ellis, two orange cats he adopted from a shelter during the pandemic.)

“When I got there last year, it seemed that there were only three of us out of 120,” Mr. Haney said of the renters in the Legislature. “That’s a very small number.”

Looking to highlight their renter status and the 17 million California households that are tenants — a little less than half the state — last year, Mr. Haney and two Assembly colleagues, Isaac Bryan and Alex Lee, founded the California Renters Caucus. A fourth Assembly member, Tasha Boerner, joined after the caucus was formed. The group added a state senator, Aisha Wahab, after she entered office this year.

Mr. Haney said there was briefly a sixth, more politically conservative member who attended one meeting but never came back. It’s possible they have other colleagues who are renters and have yet to come out.

“Being a renter is not necessarily something people project or put on their website,” Mr. Haney said.

That much seems to be changing. From cities and statehouses to US Congress, elected officials are increasingly playing up their status as tenants and forming groups to push for renter-friendly policies.

Politics is about being relatable. Candidates pet dogs and hold babies and talk about their children. Given how many families are struggling with the cost of housing and have lost hope that they could ever buy, it makes sense that elected officials would now start talking about being tenants.

London Breed, the mayor of San Francisco, talks frequently about her rent-controlled apartment in the city’s Haight district. Lindsey Horvatha member of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors — the powerful body that oversees a $43 billion budget and more than 100,000 employees — predicates discussions of housing policy with her status as a renter.

In June, federal legislators followed California with a renter caucus of their own, although that one has looser criteria. Representative Jimmy Gomez, who is chair of the Congressional Renters Caucus as well as a Democrat from Los Angelessaid instead of actual tenants his group targeted members from renter-heavy districts, even if they own a home, as he does.

“Good elected officials are going to fight for their constituents, no matter what,” Mr. Gomez said.

Besides, he added, the strictest definition of “renter” can obscure economic insecurity. His parents, for instance, were homeowners who never made more than $40,000 combined and lived in inland California without air conditioning. Other people own nothing but rent a $7,000-a-month penthouse.

“Are they considered the same?” he said.

When asked how many of his colleagues did not own a home, Mr. Gomez said, “My gut is that it’s less than 10.”

In addition to advancing Democratic priorities like subsidized housing and tenant protections, these legislators are making a bet that being perceived as a pro-renter is politically advantageous in an era in which a growing number of Americans are renting for longer periods, and often for life . Mr. Haney and Mr. Gomez both describe their caucuses — subsets of legislators organized around a common purpose — as the first for their bodies. Which is easy to believe.

Homeownership is synonymous with the the american dream, It is supported by various federal and state tax breaks and so encoded in the American mythology and financial system that historians and anthropologists assert that it has come to symbolize a permanent participation in society. The underlying message is that renting is temporary, or should be.

“There is a pretty foundational bias against renters in American sociological and political life,” said Jamila Michener, a professor of government and public policy at Cornell. “So when policymakers say, ‘Hey, this is an identity that’s relevant, and one we are willing to own and lean into,’ that’s significant.”

About two-thirds of Americans own their dwellings, and survey after survey shows that the aspiration of owning a home is no less potent today than it was for previous generations. But the number of renters has grown steadily over the past decade to about 44 million households nationwide, while punishing housing costs have migrated from coastal enclaves to metropolitan areas around the nation,

More salient to politicians, perhaps, is that renters are increasingly well-off—households that make more than $75,000 have accounted for a large majority of the growth in renters over the past decade, according to the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies. At the same time, the struggle to find something affordable has escalated from lower-income tenants to middle-income families that in past generations would very likely have owned their homes.

In other words, renter households are now composed of families much more likely to vote, And after a pandemic in which homeowners gained trillions in home-equity wealth while renters had to be supported with eviction moratoriums and tens of billions in assistancethe fragility of their position has been made clearer.

“As cost burdens show up in places where we don’t expect it, there seems to be more political momentum around addressing these problems,” said Whitney Airgood-Obrycki, senior research associate at the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies.

By organizing around an economic condition, lawmakers are embracing a concept that renter advocates refer to as “tenants as a class,

The idea is that while renters are a large and politically diverse group — low-income families on the edge of eviction, high-earning professionals renting by choice, couples whose desire for suburban living but inability to afford a down payment has made single-family house rentals one of the hottest corners of the real estate business — they still have common interests. Those include the rising cost of housing and the instability of being on a lease.

“It’s a lens that I don’t think has been captured in the same way as race, gender, age, ability, et cetera,” said Mr. Bryan, the California Assembly member and renters’ caucus member whose district is in Los Angeles. “I’m excited to be among the first five legislators in California history to develop what the political consciousness is around this situation.”

That the ranks of tenants also include legislators, albeit not many of them, is one of the points California lawmakers said they wanted to make by forming the renters’ caucus. It also plunged them into the surprisingly thorny question of who is and is not a tenant.

Does the list include lawmakers who rent a dwelling in Sacramento but own a house or condominium in their district, a criterion that would qualify a good chunk of the Legislature? The group decided no. How about Mr. Lee, the Assembly member and renters’ caucus member, whose district residence is his childhood bedroom, in a home his mother owns? He doesn’t own property, so sure.

Despite having only five members, the California Renters Caucus, like the state it represents, is racially diverse but dominated by Democrats (there are no Republicans in the caucus). Its members are white, black and Asian. Mr. Lee is a member of the Legislature’s LGBTQ Caucus, Ms. Wahab is the first Muslim Americans elected to the California Senate.

Politically speaking, the outlier is Tasha Boerner, who lives in the San Diego suburb Encinitas and is the caucus’s more conservative member (as California Democrats go). Despite being the group’s longest-serving member in the Legislature, Ms. Boerner, 50, was initially not identified as a tenant by her colleagues on the renters’ caucus.

“No one ever called my office because I’m a white mom living in Encinitas,” she said. “They thought, ‘She must be a homeowner.'”

Ms. Boerner frequently disagrees with her colleagues about the efficacy of policies like rent-control, she said, though she voted for a statewide rent cap several years ago. She is also more skeptical of the state’s efforts to speed construction by taking land-use control from cities, and she voted against a bill that effectively ended single-family zoning instate.

And yet Ms. Boerner is also a lifetime renter who has moved three times since assuming office. Her current home is a three-bedroom apartment that she shares with her two children and her ex-husband, in part because it’s cheaper than if the parents had separate places.

“Families who rent come in all shapes and sizes, and what I hope to bring is a little diversity,” she said. “We have disagreements, as any caucus does, but coming together and saying, ‘Hey, this is a demographic who matters’ — that is the importance.”


Rishabh Pant Has Resumed Batting In Nets: BCCI Gives Big Update On Wicketkeeper-Batter’s Recovery – Trending2days



BCCI also stated that Jasprit Bumrah and Prasidh Krishna have started to bowl in the nets while Shreyas Iyer and KL Rahul are looking good in the practice sessions.


Brother be safe! Sim in your phone but control with someone else, and this is how fraud can happen – Trending2days



SIM card swapping fraud is also known as SIM card swapping or SIM hijacking. This is a type of cyber crime, in which fraudsters gain unauthorized access to another person’s mobile number by changing its SIM card. When this fraud takes place, they get access to his bank account and other online accounts through the mobile number of the victim of fraud and cheat him.

This is how it happens

Fraudster collects personal information
The fraudster collects personal information about the targeted person from different sources, such as social media or public records, to use in the process of fraud. In this, they can find information like full name, address, date of birth, or other identifying details. With the personal information of the targeted person, the fraudster contacts the victim’s mobile operator and impersonates him or gives enough details to convince the company’s customer care that he is a valid account holder. In this, fraudsters, on behalf of the person who is a valid customer, claim that his current SIM card is damaged or lost and request for SIM card swapping.

A new sim card is activated with the mobile number.
If the mobile operator is convinced of the fraudster’s fraud, they activate a new SIM card (SIM card swapping fraud) with the mobile number of that person. Which effectively shifts the phone number to the new SIM card under the control of the fraudster. With control of that person’s phone number, the fraudster can now obtain all calls, SMS messages and certification codes sent to that number. This allows them to bypass Two Factor Authentication (2FA) measures used by various online accounts such as email, social media, banking and other sensitive services.

Risk of financial and personal consequences
Now with access to that victim’s mobile number and 2FA code, the fraudster can potentially access and compromise various online accounts linked to the victim. They can make unauthorized transactions, commit identity theft, or other financial crimes, which can lead to serious financial and personal consequences for the victim.

Ways to avoid SIM card swapping fraud

Use strong and unique passwords for all online accounts in today’s era of increasing cybercrime and this sim swapping fraud. Whenever possible, enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) using authenticator apps or physical security keys instead of relying solely on SMS-based 2FA. Be careful while sharing personal information online and on social media platforms. Monitor your financial and online accounts regularly for any suspicious activity. If you suspect any irregularity or service related to SIM card (SIM swap scam), contact your mobile operator immediately. Consider using a Virtual Private Network (VPN) for added protection from online threats.

read this also

Infinix Note 30 5G vs VIVO Y27: Which one will you buy at the same price? Know who is Bahubali


Why Is Switzerland—of All Places—Importing So Much Cheese? – Trending2days



The Swiss are proud of their cheese, and most of the cheese they eat are local varieties like Gruyère, Emmental and other hard cheeses from milk from happy cows that are famous all over the world. The Swiss also eat a lot of cheese: more than 50 pounds per person per year, versus about 40 pounds per person in the United States.

“Cheese is part of our identity,” said Daniel Koller, a director at Swissmilk, Switzerland’s dairy association. That’s why one of Mr. Koller’s colleagues, the president of the association, created a storm this month when he told a Swiss newspaper that Switzerland was on track to import more cheese than it exports this year, which he called “absurd economically, socially and ecologically.”

In fact, the Swiss cheese trade balance has been shrinking for decades, and especially since the market was liberalized in 2007, which allowed the country to trade with the European Union without tariffs or quotas in either direction. Switzerland now exports about 40 percent of the cheese it produces, per industry estimates.

But in each of the first five months of this year, Switzerland imported more cheese by weight than it sold abroad, according to customs data. In part, that’s because the Swiss have developed a taste for foreign cheeses, with local varieties accounting for 64 percent of consumption last year, down from 77 percent in 2007, according to Swissmilk.

The number of dairy farmers in Switzerland has fallen in recent decades, with a drop of more than half over the past 25 years, Mr. Koller said. On top of that, farming operations in Switzerland are small: The average size of a herd is about 27 cows, Mr. Koller said, and dairy farms with more than 100 cows are rare.

Although an influx of foreign cheese may challenge notions of Swiss national identity, economists say there is no need to panic. Swiss producers have become more specialized in recent years, and the cheeses they export tend to be the higher-value varieties, like Gruyère. Imports are cheaper—and softer—and largely come from France. (What’s called “Swiss cheese” in the United States is an American reproduction of Swiss hard cheeses, known — of course — for its signature holes.)

Not all the cheese that is imported into Switzerland is consumed there, either. A large chunk of the cheese and curd brought into the country gets refined in Switzerland and then exported.

“The trade difference in cheese itself is not a major thing to worry about,” said Martin Mosler, an economist at IWP, an economic policy institute at the University of Lucerne. “We are better than most of the world at the high quality stuff,” he said. Switzerland continues to run a healthy trade surplus in cheese by financial value: On average, Swiss cheese exports fetch roughly 10 Swiss Francs per kilo (about $11.60), compared with about six Swiss Francs per kilo paid for imports.

Inflation has also played a role in the Swiss cheese trade. While 2021 was a record year for Swiss exports, last year saw a drop because Switzerland’s largest market, Germany, was hit hard by inflation, squeezing shoppers’ budgets. The strong Swiss franc also made cheese more expensive in Germany.

“These consumers are very price sensitive,” Mr. Mosler said.

By contrast, the strong franc made imports cheaper, and increased imports can be good for Swiss consumers, Mr. Mosler said. People want more choice for lower prices and “that’s great for Switzerland itself,” he said.

But Swiss farmers who produce cheaper cheeses may be affected by the shifting trade balance.

Milk prices in Switzerland have risen over the past few years, including for milk that’s used in cheese, according to Robert Finger, a professor at ETH Zurich, a university. It is not “too bad” yet, but he acknowledged that the number of farms has continued to fall in Switzerland, like in the rest of Europe. That isn’t strongly related to higher imports, Mr. Finger said, but has mostly been driven by other economic and social developments.

The United States has seen a similar trend, with a loss of about half its dairy farmers between 1997 and 2017, partly caused by consolidation of the food system, the disappearance of many small family farms and lower milk prices around the world, said Hannah Tremblay. , a policy and advocacy manager at Farm Aid, an agriculture nonprofit.

Mr. Koller, the director at Swissmilk, said it was important to continue producing Swiss cheese for Swiss consumers. One of the goals of his organization is to encourage people to buy local products that adhere to Switzerland’s high quality and environmental standards.

But, tastes aside, he added that the quality and standards in European Union countries often don’t differ wildly from those in Switzerland. “It doesn’t make sense just to close borders for cheese,” Mr. Mosler said.


Lawmakers Challenge Ford and Chinese Battery Partner Over Forced Labor – Trending2days



A partnership between Ford Motor and a major Chinese battery maker is facing scrutiny by Republican lawmakers, who say it could make an American automaker reliant on a company with links to forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region,

In a letter sent to Ford on Thursday, the chairs of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party and the House Ways and Means Committee demanded more information about the partnership, including what they said was a plan by Ford to employ several hundred workers from China at a new battery factory in Michigan.

Ford announced in February that it planned to set up the $3.5 billion factory using technology from contemporary Amperex Technology Ltd., known as CATL, the world’s largest maker of batteries for electric vehicles. CATL produces about a third of electric vehicle batteries globally and supplies General Motors, Volkswagen, BMW, Tesla and other major automakers.

Ford has defended the partnership, saying it will help diversify Ford’s supply chain and allow a battery that is less expensive and more durable than current alternatives to be made in the United States for the first time, rather than imported.

But lawmakers, who previously criticized the partnership, cited evidence that CATL had not relinquished its ownership of a company it helped set up in Xinjiang, where the United Nations have identified systemic human rights violations.

CATL publicly divested its share of the company, Xinjiang Zhicun Lithium Industry Company, in March, after its deal with Ford was announced. But the shares were bought by an investment partnership in which CATL owned a partial stake and a former catl manager who holds leadership roles in other companies owned by the battery maker, corporate records show.

The circumstances of the sale raise “serious questions about whether CATL is attempting to obscure links to forced labor,” wrote Representatives Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin, the chairman of the select committee, and Jason Smith of Missouri, the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee. .

The lawmakers, citing details of Ford’s licensing agreement that are on file with the select committee, also criticized the automaker’s commitment to employ several hundred Chinese workers. Employees from China would set up and maintain CATL’s equipment at the Michigan factory until about 2038, the lawmakers said. The factory is expected to employ 2,500 US workers, Ford has said.

“Ford has argued that the deal will create thousands of American jobs, further Ford’s ‘commitments to sustainability and human rights’ and lead to American battery technology advancements,” they wrote. “But newly discovered information raises serious questions about each claim.”

TR Reid, a spokesman for Ford, said the company was going through the letter and would respond in good faith. He said that human rights were fundamental to how Ford did business, and that the automaker was thorough in assessing such issues.

“There has been an awful lot said and implied about this project that is incorrect,” Mr. Reid said. “At the end of the day, we think creating 2,500 good-paying jobs with a new multibillion investment in the US for great technology that we’ll bring to bear in great electric vehicles is good all the way around.”

CATL’s collaboration with Ford could be a bellwether for the electric vehicle industry in the United States. Critics have labeled the agreement a “Trojan horse” for Chinese interests and called for scuttling the partnership, If it succeeds, they say, reliance on Chinese technology could become the norm for the US electric vehicle industry.

Ultimately, China’s control over key technologies like batteries could leave the United States “in a far weaker position,” said Erik Gordon, a clinical assistant professor at the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business.

“The profit margins go to the innovators who provide the advanced technology, not the people with screwdrivers that assemble the advanced technology,” he said.

But CATL and other Chinese companies have battery technology not readily available from suppliers in the United States or Europe. The Michigan plant would be the first in the United States to produce so-called LFP batteries that use lithium, iron and phosphate as their main active materials.

They are heavier than the lithium, nickel and manganese batteries currently used by Ford and other automakers but less expensive to make and more durable, able to withstand numerous charges without degrading. They also do not use nickel or cobalt, another battery material, which are often mined in environmentally damaging ways, and sometimes with child labor.

Without the most advanced or least expensive batteries, US carmakers could fall behind Chinese rivals like BYD that are pushing into Europe and other markets outside China. Americans may also have to pay more for electric cars and trucks, which would slow sales of vehicles that don’t emit greenhouse gases.

A battery unveiled by CATL last year delivers hundreds of miles of driving range after a charge of just 10 minutes.

“The hard truth is that the Chinese took a huge gamble on electric vehicles and plopped down over a trillion Chinese dollars and subsidies on this industry, and it just so happens that gamble came up all aces,” said Scott Kennedy, a China expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

“If you decide not to partner with a very large battery maker, then you’re essentially committing to delaying the US energy transition,” he added.

Ford plans to use batteries made with CATL technology in lower-priced versions of vehicles like the Mustang Mach-E and F-150 Lightning pickup. The least expensive version of Tesla’s Model 3 sedan comes with an LFP battery that CATL is widely reported to have supplied.

For decades, Western companies have had a monopoly on the world’s most advanced technologies, and have sought access to the Chinese market while also safeguarding their intellectual property.

But China’s dominance in electric vehicle batteries, as well as in the production of solar panels and wind turbines, has flipped that dynamic. It has created a particularly tricky dilemma for the Biden administration and other Democrats, who want to reduce the country’s reliance on China but also argue that the United States must quickly make a transition to cleaner energy sources to try to mitigate climate change.

The Solar and electric vehicle battery industry’s Exposure to Xinjiang further complicates the situation. The Biden administration has condemned the Chinese government for carrying out genocide and crimes against humanity In region.

The United States last year barred imports of products made in whole or in part in Xinjiang, saying companies operating in the region are not able to ensure that their facilities are free of forced labor.

In 2022, CATL and a partner registered a lithium processing company in the region called Xinjiang Zhicun Lithium Industry Company, which promoted plans to become the world’s largest producer of lithium carbonate, a key battery component.

Through a series of subsidiaries and shareholder relationships, that Xinjiang lithium company has financial ties to a Chinese electricity company, Tebian Electric Apparatus Stock Company, or TBEA, according to records that The New York Times reviewed through Sayari Graph, a mapping tool for corporate ownership. TBEA has participated extensively in so-called poverty alleviation and labor transfer programs in Xinjiang that the United States considers a form of forced labour.

While the Chinese government argues that labor transfer and poverty alleviation programs are aimed at improving living standards in the region, human rights experts say that they are also directed at pacifying and indoctrinating the population, and that Uyghurs and other minority groups there cannot say no to these programs without fear of detention or punishment.

CATL did not respond to a request for comment. In December, it told The Times that it was a minority shareholder in the Xinjiang company and strictly prohibited any form of forced labor in its supply chain.

The Republican lawmakers also raised concerns about whether batteries made at Ford’s Michigan plant would qualify for tax credits that the Biden administration was offering consumers who bought electric vehicles as part of the Inflation Reduction Act.

The law prohibits “foreign entities of concern” — like companies in China, Russia, Iran or North Korea — from benefiting from government tax credits. But because Ford is licensing CATL technology for the plant — rather than forming a joint venture, as has often been the case with automakers and battery suppliers — the batteries made in Michigan may still qualify for those incentives.

The Biden administration has not yet clarified exactly how the restriction on foreign entities will be applied. But Ford officials said they had been in conversation with the administration about the Michigan plant, and were confident that the partnership would qualify for all of the law’s benefits.

“We think batteries built by American workers in an American plant run by the wholly owned subsidiary of an American company will and should qualify,” Mr. Reid, the Ford spokesman, said.


Bangladesh board unhappy with Asia Cup schedule, says travel will affect players’ preparation – Trending2days



BCB Unhappy With Asia Cup Schedule: With the announcement of the Asia Cup schedule, it became clear that 4 matches of the tournament would be played in Pakistan and the remaining 9 matches would be played in Sri Lanka. Resentment is also being seen regarding the program of Asia Cup being played in hybrid model for the first time. In this, former Pakistan captain Butt first expressed his anger. At the same time, Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) has also expressed unhappiness about the official schedule.

Out of all the 6 teams participating in this tournament, all except India will play their matches in Pakistan and Sri Lanka. At the same time, the Indian team will play all its matches in Sri Lanka. Describing this schedule as strange, the former Pakistan captain targeted the PCB. BCB’s Cricket Operations Chairman Jalal Yunus has said that the travel during the tournament will affect the preparations of the players.

Bangladesh Cricket Operations Chairman Jalal Yunus said in his statement to Cricbuzz that we have to play our first group match in Sri Lanka and the second in Pakistan. We can’t do anything about it, we have to go. We will travel by chartered plane, it is the responsibility of the Asian Cricket Council. Of course we would like to travel with a better airline. If it is a national airline or a chartered plane then surely it will be good for all.

Players have to prepare themselves both mentally and physically

In his statement, Jalal further said that in order to travel by air, you have to reach the airport 2 hours before the flight. Players have to prepare themselves for this both mentally and physically. If all the other teams agree to the schedule, then we will have to proceed accordingly.

Read this also…

Indian Team: On this day in 2014, Team India repeated 28 years old history at Lord’s ground, know


Nothing Phone 2’s first sale today, you can save up to Rs 3,000 – Trending2days



Nothing Phone 2 Goes on sale: The first sale of Nothing’s second transparent phone will start at 12 noon today. You will be able to buy the smartphone through Flipkart. If you are also thinking of buying this phone, then know about the bank offers available on it. You can save up to Rs.3,000 on the original price. You will be able to buy the smartphone in three storage options which include 8/128GB, 12/256GB and 12/512GB.

Discount available on these bank cards

If you buy Nothing phone 2 with HDFC or AXIS bank debit or credit card, then you will get an instant discount of Rs 3,000. Nothing Phone 2 has been launched by the company at a price of Rs 44,999 while the top end variant costs Rs 54,999. The company is also giving Nothing earsticks cheaply to the customers who buy Nothing Phone 2. For this, you have to activate the phone by ordering and then come to Flipkart and buy Earsticks. Automatically their price will be reduced from Rs 6,999 to Rs 4,250.


Talking about the specification, Nothing Phone 2 has a 6.7-inch Full HD Plus display which supports a refresh rate of 120hz. Apart from this, two cameras of 50+50MP are available for photography. A 32MP camera is available in the front. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor and 4700 mAh battery are available in the phone.

Samsung’s Galaxy Unpacked event on July 26

Korean company Samsung is to have Galaxy Unpacked event on 26th July. In this event, the company can launch Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Galaxy Z Flip 5 smartphones. This time the Galaxy Z Flip 5 will get a 3.4-inch display, which is less than Motorola’s flip phone. Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SOC can be supported in both the smartphones.

Read also: These are cool smartphones under Rs 10,000, get money back, battery camera all dazzling


AMC Theater Chain to Stop Charging for Better Seats – Trending2days



AMC is abandoning plans to charge more for movie seats depending on their location. But higher prices for center-middle seats at theaters where AMC has been testing the concept will remain in effect this weekend, when “Barbie” and “Oppenheimer” are expected to draw significant crowds.

AMC Entertainment, the world’s largest theater chain, said on Thursday that it would “pivot away” from a contentious initiative called Sightline, in which seats at evening screenings had three tiers of pricing, ending the long-held cinema custom of charging the same amount for any seat in a theater. (Discounts of $1 to $2 were offered for the neck-craning front row, increases of $1 to $2 were charged for the center-middle and the status quo remained for the rest.)

The concept was rolled out in March at theaters in New York, Illinois and Kansas to howls of protest from some moviegoers. AMC always labeled it as a test.

The experiment will end sometime in August, an AMC spokesperson said. But the company plans to start a new trial involving front-row seats, which often go unsold. Later this year, AMC said it would pull out traditional front-row seats and replace them with “large, comfortable, lounge-style seating areas that will allow guests to lay all the way back.”

AMC and other theater chains, after steadily raising prices at their concession stands, have begun to focus more intently on seats for revenue growth. Increasingly, for instance, multiplexes have been pushing customers toward premium-priced tickets for screenings that feature extra-extra-large screens or enhanced sound systems.

Adding to the pressure, attendance has still not recovered from the early pandemic, when many theaters were closed for months. So far this year, ticket sales are running roughly 20 percent behind the same period in 2019.

AMC said Sightline did not pan out as it had hoped. In particular, the company saw “little or no incremental lift in front-row attendance, even with a price reduction applied to those seats.” About three out of every four customers who previously sat in center-middle seats paid the surcharge to continue doing so, the AMC said. Some of those people moved to other seats. A small percentage stopped buying tickets at AMC.

Notably, competitors did not follow AMC in re-pricing seats, making the company less competitive in the test markets.

AMC’s plans to stop the initiative were reported earlier by Bloomberg News.


Who Is India’s 395th Debutant In Test Cricket, He’s Son Of A Taxi Driver And Hails From ‘Mirzapur’ Star Pankaj Tripathi’s Gopalganj – Trending2days



Team India got their 395th debutant in Test cricket when all-rounder Shardul Thakur pulled up with a groin injury on Day 1 of their 2nd Test at Queen’s Park Oval at Port of Spain in Trinidad. Bengal and Delhi Capitals pacer Mukesh Kumar made his much-awaited international debut after being handed his first Test cap by skipper Rohit Sharma on Thursday.

It has been a long and arduous journey for Mukesh Kumar, who is the son of a taxi driver and born in a small town of Gopalganj in Bihar. The biggest claim to fame of Gopalganj is that Bollywood and ‘Mirzapur’ star Pankaj Tripathi also comes from the same town.

Who is Mukesh Kumar?

cre Trending Stories

The Bengal pacer spent all of his childhood in Gopalganj in Bihar. By 2012, Mukesh Kumar had completed his B.Com and his father, who was a taxi driver, called him to Kolkata.

Mukesh initially joined the Kalighat club, where former India pacer Ashok Dinda was a member of a set team. “I was the youngest of the six but we had severe financial problems. It was Rano sir, who spoke to then CAB secretary Sourav Ganguly, who arranged for my stay at Eden Gardens and my diet was taken care of,” Mukesh Kumar told PTI after the IPL 2023 auction last year.

“I had come through the ranks having played Buchi Babu and then waited for my turn. The endeavor would be to keep working hard,” the 28-year-old said.

In 39 matches, Mukesh Kumar has taken 149 wickets at a strike-rate of 47.70. He has also played 24 List A games taking 26 wickets and 33 T20 games taking 32 wickets.

As Bengal was battling to try and win the Ranji Trophy title in 2019-20, Mukesh Kumar tragically lost his father due to illness. “When Bengal was having a dream season in 2019-20 where we played finals, I was struggling with my father’s failing health. I would train in the morning and tend to him at the hospital during the evenings. But he passed away due to brain hemorrhage,” he said.

Mukesh Kumar bagged Rs 5.5 crore IPL contract

The pacer sparked off a bidding war in the IPL 2023 auction last year and was finally bagged by the Delhi Capitals for Rs 5.5 crore. Skipper Rohit Sharma revealed at the toss that Mukesh Kumar’s Test debut was a reward for his hard work in domestic cricket.

“We were looking to bat first. Looks nice and sunny as well. It’s going to get slower and slower. Shardul has pulled up a niggle. He’s not fit. Mukesh Kumar is going to make his debut. He has worked hard in the domestic cricket. There’s a lot of memories, the rivalry between the two teams has always been exciting to watch. It’s always been a tough tour, you have to work hard. Even in the last game, we had to work hard, especially the batters. Hopefully we get the result we are expecting,” Rohit Sharma said at the toss on Thursday.