Monday, April 15, 2024
Home Blog

After 55 months, Kohli scored a century on foreign soil, left behind Tendulkar and equaled Bradman – Trending2days

0


Virat Kohli’s 76th Century Stats: Virat Kohli has made his 500th international match very special with his century. In the second Test of the series against the West Indies, Kohli made many new records along with scoring his 29th Test century. Kohli finally ended the wait for his next Test century away from home for nearly 55 months in the West Indies. This is also Kohli’s 12th century against the Windies team in all formats.

With his 29th Test century, Virat Kohli has now registered a total of 76 centuries in international cricket. So far in world cricket, till the 500th international match, the record of scoring the most centuries was in the name of Sachin Tendulkar who had scored 75 centuries. Now Kohli has left him behind in this matter. At the same time, in his 500th match, Kohli has also become the highest individual scorer. Before this, none of the 9 players who had reached this stage could see even an inning of 50 runs with the bat.

With his 29th Test century, Kohli has also equaled the all-time great Sir Don Bradman’s record of Test centuries. With this, Kohli has jointly reached the 10th position with Bradman in the list of top-10 players with most Test centuries in world cricket.

Kohli completed 25 centuries while playing at number-4

In Test cricket, Virat Kohli’s name has now been recorded for scoring 25 centuries while batting at number-4. While batting at this number, Sachin Tendulkar has scored maximum 44 Test centuries so far. Jacques Kallis is at number two with 35 centuries while Mahela Jayawardene is at third with 30 Test centuries. While Kohli is fourth in the list, legendary former Windies player Brian Lara has reached fifth place with 24 Test hundreds.

Read this also…

Ajinkya Rahane: Former opener batsman warned Ajinkya Rahane, said- If this continues then he will be discharged from the team


Booz Allen Pays $377.5 Million to Settle Government Billing Case – Trending2days

0


The consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton has agreed to pay $377.5 million to settle a federal lawsuit that accused it of falsely billing the US government, the Justice Department said on Friday.

The settlement resolves claims that between 2011 and 2021, Booz Allen improperly charged the government for indirect costs that it should have billed under its commercial and international contracts, the Justice Department said in a news release. The government had alleged that the firm “obtained reimbursement from the government for the costs of commercial activities that provided no benefit to the United States.”

A consulting firm’s indirect costs can include expenses like equipment, marketing and office space.

Booz Allen, which is based in McLean, Va., has lucrative defense and intelligence contracts with the federal government. Investigators began reviewing the firm’s billing practices in 2016.

“Government contractors must turn square corners when billing the government for costs under government contracts,” Brian M. Boynton, principal deputy assistant attorney and head of the Justice Department’s civil division, said in a statement.

Matthew M. Graves, US attorney for the District of Columbia, said in the news release that the settlement was “one of the largest procurement fraud settlements in history.”

A spokeswoman for Booz Allen said in a statement on Friday that the company believed it had acted “lawfully and responsibly.”

“It has been decided to settle this civil inquiry for pragmatic business reasons to avoid the delay, uncertainty and expense of protracted litigation,” the spokeswoman said. “The company did not want to engage in what likely would have been a yearslong court fight with its largest client, the US government, on an immensely complex matter.”

A parallel criminal investigation into the allegations by the Justice Department was closed in 2021 with no charges. An investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission is ongoing.


Meet Nishant Sindhu: From Winning U-19 World Cup To Being MS Dhoni’s Teammate In CSK – Journey Of India A All-Rounder – Trending2days

0


Meet Nishant Sindhu, the 19-year-old all-rounder from Haryana’s Rohtak, whose incredible journey from a budding boxer to an IPL star has captivated the cricketing world. Having been selected by MS Dhoni’s Chennai Super Kings (CSK) in the 2023 IPL Auction for INR 60 lakh, Nishant’s dreams have come true. In the ongoing Sindhu, proved to be the driving force behind India A’s remarkable victory against Bangladesh A in the semi-final of the ACC Men’s Emerging Teams Asia Cup 2023. His exceptional performance with both bat and ball led India A to a resounding 51-run win, securing their spot in the highly anticipated final.

Let’s take a closer look at the story of this young talent and how he evolved into a cricketing force to be reckoned with.

cre Trending Stories

Early Years and Boxing Beginnings

Nishant Sindhu’s early passion was boxing, much like his father, Sunil Sindhu, a state-level boxer. However, fate had other plans for Nishant when he crossed paths with Ashwani Kumar, a former Haryana first-class cricketer and coach. Under Kumar’s guidance, Nishant’s talent for cricket blossomed, and he soon fell in love with the sport.

Rapid Rise in Cricket

Nishant Sindhu’s cricketing journey began in earnest when he participated in the U-14 Dhruv Pandove Trophy in 2017, scoring an impressive 290 runs and taking 24 wickets for Haryana. His success continued in the U-16 Vijay Merchant Trophy, where he amassed 572 runs and bagged 23 wickets, leading Haryana to victory over Jharkhand in the final.

U-19 World Cup Success

Nishant’s skills and dedication paid off when he got selected for the U-19 World Cup in the West Indies. During the tournament, he showcased his potential, claiming six wickets from five games. Despite a few of his teammates making it to the IPL in 2022, Nishant missed out on the opportunity.

IPL Dreams Come True

Finally, in the IPL Auction of 2023, Nishant Sindhu’s dreams came true as he was picked by the Chennai Super Kings for INR 60 lakh. Watching the auction with his Haryana teammates after a Ranji Trophy fixture, Nishant was overjoyed at the prospect of playing under the leadership of none other than MS Dhoni. Excited to learn and grow under the guidance of his idol, Ravindra Jadeja, Nishant is determined to make the most of this opportunity.

Deadly Left-Arm Spinner and a Promising Batsman

Nishant Sindhu is a potent left-arm spinner, capable of deceiving batsmen with his flight and variations. He loves to play with the batsman’s mind, setting them up for dismissal. With the ability to bowl long spells, Nishant has honed his skills and even added the arm ball to his arsenal.

As a batsman, Nishant’s left-handed flair is evident, and he has the knack for building partnerships and rescuing the team from difficult situations. His performances in various domestic tournaments and the U-19 World Cup have demonstrated his potential to become a reliable middle-order batsman.




Motorola Razr 40 Ultra could not pass in this test, the price is Rs 89,999, this is how it came – Trending2days

0


There is an update regarding the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra smartphone launched in May this year. This smartphone has failed in a test. In a durability test by Jack Nelson of JerryRigEverything YouTube channel, it has been found that the new Moto Razr 40 Ultra is not as strong as other foldable phones. Whereas Motorola phones are known for being durable and reliable. It was revealed from this test that in terms of durability, customers cannot give importance to Motorola Razr 40 Ultra.

This is the first time that…

According to the news, during the trial, Nelson exerted increasing amounts of pressure on the cover screen of the Razr 40 Ultra, which is made of Gorilla Glass Victus. On applying pressure, the cover screen started breaking and on applying more pressure, it also broke. According to the news of Financial Express, this happened for the first time when the cover screen of a foldable smartphone broke in the bend test. In previous tests, the cover screens of other foldable smartphones were only cracked, not broken.

no support behind the display

When looking into the reasons for screen breakage during the test, it has been seen that there is no support behind the display to keep the glass safe when the pressure exceeds the rated capacity. The glass is exposed to direct pressure, and there is nothing to prevent it from shattering or shattering. After this test of Jack Nelson, there is no response from Motorola till now. The Moto Razr 40 series consists of two models – the Motorola Razr 40 and the high-end Razr 40 Ultra.

Price is Rs 89,999

The price of Moto Razr 40 Ultra (8GB + 245GB storage) is Rs 89,999. Its next sale on Amazon is to be held on July 23. This smartphone (Motorola Razr 40 Ultra) has a 6.69-inch 1080p LTPO AMOLED display with 165Hz refresh rate. The cover screen is 3.6 inches. The smartphone sports a dual camera setup at the back with a 12MP main sensor and another 13MP ultrawide. There is a 32MP camera for selfie. It has a 3,800mAh battery.

read this also

Stylish earbuds are available in budget less than Rs 1500, see model and price


In US, Regulating AI Is in Its ‘Early Days’ – Trending2days

0


controlling artificial intelligence has been a hot topic in Washington in recent months, with lawmakers holding hearings and news conferences and the White House announcing Voluntary AI safety commitments by seven technology companies on Friday.

But a closer look at the activity raises questions about how meaningful the actions are in setting policies around the rapidly evolving technology.

The answer is that it is not very meaningful yet. The United States is only at the beginning of what is likely to be a long and difficult path toward the creation of AI rules, lawmakers and policy experts said. While there have been hearings, meetings with top tech executives at the White House and speeches to introduce AI bills, it is too soon to predict even the roughest sketches of regulations to protect consumers and contain the risks that the technology poses to jobs, the spread of disinformation and security.

“It is still early days, and no one knows what a law would look like yet,” said Chris Lewis, president of the consumer group Public Knowledge, which has called for the creation of an independent agency to regulate AI and other tech companies.

The United States remains far behind Europe, where lawmakers are preparing to enact an AI law this year that would put new restrictions on what are seen as the technology’s riskiest uses, In contrast, there remains a lot of disagreement in the United States on the best way to handle a technology that many American lawmakers are still trying to understand.

That suits many of the tech companies, policy experts said. While some of the companies have said they welcome rules around AI, they have also argued against tougher regulations akin to those being created in Europe.

Here’s a rundown on the state of AI regulation in the United States.

The Biden administration has been on a fast-track listening tour with AI companies, academics and civil society groups. The effort began in May when Vice President Kamala Harris met at the white house with the chief executives of Microsoft, Google, OpenAI and Anthropic and pushed the tech industry to take safety more seriously.

On Friday, representatives of seven tech companies appeared at the White House to announce a set of principles for making their AI technologies safer, including third-party security checks and watermarking of AI-generated content to help stem the spread of misinformation.

Many of the practices that were announced had already been in place at OpenAI, Google and Microsoft, or were on track to take effect. They don’t represent new regulations. Promises of self-regulation also fell short of what consumer groups had hoped.

“Voluntary commitments are not enough when it comes to Big Tech,” said Caitriona Fitzgerald, deputy director at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a privacy group. “Congress and federal regulators must put meaningful, enforceable guardrails in place to ensure the use of AI is fair, transparent and protects individuals’ privacy and civil rights.”

Last fall, the White House introduced a blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, a set of guidelines on consumer protections with the technology. The guidelines also aren’t regulations and are not enforceable. This week, White House officials said they were working on an executive order on AI, but didn’t reveal details and timing.

The loudest drumbeat on regulating AI has come from lawmakers, some of whom have introduced bills on the technology. Their proposals include the creation of an agency to oversee AI, liability for AI technologies that spread disinformation and the requirement of licensing for new AI tools.

Lawmakers have also held hearings about AI, including a hearing in may with sam altman, the chief executive of OpenAI, which makes the ChatGPT chatbot. Some lawmakers have tossed around ideas for other regulations during the hearings, including nutritional labels to notify consumers of AI risks.

The bills are in their earliest stages and so far do not have the support needed to advance. Last month, the Senate leader, Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, announced a monthslong process for the creation of AI legislation that included educational sessions for members in the fall.

“In many ways we’re starting from scratch, but I believe Congress is up to the challenge,” he said during a speech at the time at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Regulatory agencies are beginning to take action by policing some issues emanating from AI

Last week, the Federal Trade Commission opened an investigation into OpenAI’s ChatGPT and asked for information on how the company secures its systems and how the chatbot could potentially harm consumers through the creation of false information. The FTC chair, Lina Khan, has said she believes the agency has ample power under consumer protection and competition laws to police problematic behavior by AI companies.

“Waiting for Congress to act is not ideal given the usual timeline of congressional action,” said Andres Sawicki, a professor of law at the University of Miami.


Actors’ Strike Leaves Celebrity Podcasts in the Gray Zone – Trending2days

0


Actors who host podcasts are divided on how or whether to continue their programs, as the 8-day-old Hollywood actors’ strike reverberates through an adjacent industry that didn’t exist during the union’s last work stoppage 43 years ago.

The official targets of the strike are film and television productions associated with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, a group that includes all of the major Hollywood studios and streamers like Netflix, Amazon and Apple. But messaging from the actors’ union, SAG-AFTRA, barring promotion of past or future work for the studios has left some members unsure of whether their podcasts are in violation of union policy.

The actors hosting podcasts that recap the TV showsIt’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia,One Tree Hill“and”bones,” for example, canceled or did special episodes this week.

But similar podcasts — including ones aboutWill & Grace,Gilmore Girls,new girl“and”Beverly Hills, 90210— continued as scheduled. An episode ofoffice ladies,” a podcast about “The Office,” was published two days behind schedule as the hosts, Jenna Fischer and Angela Kinsey, debated how to proceed, according to a person close to the show.

In an episode of the “One Tree Hill” rewatch podcast “Drama Queens” that aired on Monday, the actors Sophia Bush, Hilarie Burton Morgan and Bethany Joy Lenz expressed uncertainty about whether their show could continue in its usual format and answered listener questions instead.

“Because our show is currently still streaming — even though we filmed it 20 years ago — is doing a rewatch pod considered promotion?” Burton Morgan asked, noting that she and the others awaited “a clear answer” from the union. Bush said later that “nobody really knows” what the guidelines allow.

The actresses Emily Deschanel and Carla Gallo, whose “Bones” rewatch podcast, “Boneheads,” was scheduled to debut this week, said in a statement on Wednesday that the show would be postponed.

“We’re waiting for additional guidance from the guild and will keep everyone updated with the new launch date as soon as we have it,” the statement read.

Pamela Greenwalt, a spokeswoman for SAG-AFTRA, said in a phone call on Friday that although the actors’ union considers rewatch podcasts promotional, actors under contract to produce such shows will not be considered in breach for continuing them.

Complicating matters further is the fact that many Hollywood studios and streamers also have podcast arms. Amazon, for example, owns or distributes several actor-led podcasts through its subsidiaries Audible and Wondery, including “Smartless,” hosted by Jason Bateman, Will Arnett and Sean Hayes; ,Life Is Short With Justin Longhosted by Justin Long; andBaby, This Is Keke PalmerHosted by Keke Palmer. All of those shows released new episodes this week.

While neither Audible nor Wondery is directly affiliated with the film and TV alliance, their connection to Amazon may put the actors they work with in an uncomfortable position. Representatives for Bateman, Arnett, Hayes, Long and Palmer didn’t respond to requests for comment. Greenwalt, of SAG-AFTRA, said podcasts produced by members of the film and TV alliance are not necessarily in violation and that actors with questions should consult with the union.

If the strike keeps actors from film and television sets for months, as some on both sides fear, podcasts could become a significant source of work. The vast majority of SAG-AFTRA’s 160,000 members are working-class performers, many of whom say the economics of streaming film and television have made it harder than ever to make a living,

Some kinds of podcasts, such as those that have no affiliation with—and that do not feature discussions of work produced by—the AMPTP, are not in dispute. The actress and writer Natasha Leggero, who hosts the relationship podcast “The Endless Honeymoonalong with her husband, the comedian Moshe Kasher, said their show was moving ahead. “People still need advice and have dirty secrets to air even when actors and writers are on strike,” Leggero said.

Actors are free to appear as guests on celebrity interview podcasts as long as they don’t “promote struck work” while doing so, according to union guidelines. But, in practice, asking a performer not to talk about their work may prove awkward for everyone involved.

On a recent episode of the comedy podcastLovett or Leave It,” the host, Jon Lovett, greeted his guest, the actor Jared Goldstein, by saying, “I like the thing that you’re in.” Goldstein, who appears in the most recent season of “Black Mirror,” replied, “Oh, thank you for liking the thing that I’m in, which for legal reasons cannot be discussed at this time.”


IND vs WI: Sachin Tendulkar became a fan of Virat Kohli, heart touching thing written on social media – Trending2days

0


Sachin Tendulkar on Virat Kohli: The second Test match between India and West Indies is being played in Port of Spain. On the second day of this match, Indian batsman Virat Kohli scored a brilliant century. This is the 29th century of Virat Kohli’s Test career. Virat Kohli scored 121 runs in 206 balls. He hit 11 fours in his innings. However, the former Indian captain ended the drought of a century in Test matches on foreign soil. Actually, Virat Kohli could not cross the century mark in Test matches on foreign soil for a long time, but ended the wait of the fans in this match.

Sachin Tendulkar put up a story for Virat Kohli…

At the same time, Virat Kohli is in top trending on social media after the century. Social media fans are constantly praising their favorite cricketer. However, now the God of cricket Sachin Tendulkar praised Virat Kohli’s century. Sachin Tendulkar has posted a story on Instagram. Virat Kohli is seen in this story. Apart from this, Sachin Tendulkar has written in the caption that ‘one more day, one more century’. However, Sachin Tendulkar’s Instagram story continues to be a topic of discussion among fans. Social media users are continuously giving their feedback by commenting.

What happened in the India-West Indies Test so far?

On the other hand, talking about this match, till the time of writing the news, the Indian team has scored 395 runs for 7 wickets. At this time Ravi Ashwin and Jaydev Unadkat are at the crease for India. Virat Kohli played a century for India. While apart from this, Yashasvi Jaiswal, Rohit Sharma and Ravindra Jadeja crossed the figure of fifty runs. So far Kemar Roach and Jason Holder took 2-2 wickets for the West Indies. While Shannon Gabriel and Jomel Varican got 1-1 success.

read this also-

IND vs WI: Wife Anushka Sharma’s reaction on Virat Kohli’s century, social media post will win hearts!


Stylish earbuds are available in budget less than Rs 1500, see model and price – Trending2days

0



Stylish earbuds are available in budget less than Rs 1500, see model and price


7 AI Companies Agree to Safeguards After Pressure From the White House – Trending2days

0


Seven leading AI companies in the United States have agreed to voluntary safeguards on the technology’s development, the White House announced on Friday, pledging to manage the risks of the new tools even as they compete over the potential of artificial intelligence.

The seven companies — Amazon, Anthropic, Google, Inflection, Meta, Microsoft and OpenAI — will formally announce their commitment to new standards in the areas of safety, security and trust at a meeting with President Biden at the White House on Friday afternoon.

The announcement comes as the companies are racing to outdo each other with versions of AI that offer powerful new ways to create text, photos, music and video without human input. But the technological leaps have prompted fears about the spread of disinformation and dire warnings of a “risk of extinction” as self-aware computers evolve.

The voluntary safeguards are only an early, tentative step as Washington and governments across the world rush to put in place legal and regulatory frameworks for the development of artificial intelligence. They reflect an urgency by the Biden administration and lawmakers to respond to the rapidly evolving technology, even as lawmakers have struggled to regulate social media and other technologies.

The White House offered no details of a forthcoming presidential executive order that would deal with a bigger problem: How to control the ability of China and other competitors to get hold of the new artificial intelligence programs, or the components used to develop them.

That involves new restrictions on advanced semiconductors and restrictions on the export of the large language models. Those are hard to control — much of the software can fit, compressed, on a thumb drive.

An executive order could provoke more opposition from the industry than Friday’s voluntary commitments, which experts said were already reflected in the practices of the companies involved. The promises won’t restrain the plans of the AI ​​companies nor hinder the development of their technologies. And as voluntary commitments, they won’t be enforced by government regulators.

“We are pleased to make these voluntary commitments alongside others in the sector,” Nick Clegg, the president of global affairs at Meta, the parent company of Facebook, said in a statement. “They are an important first step in ensuring responsible guardrails are established for AI and they create a model for other governments to follow.”

As part of the safeguards, the companies agreed to:

  • Security testing of their AI products, in part by independent experts and to share information about their products with governments and others who are attempting to manage the risks of the technology.

  • Ensuring that consumers are able to spot AI-generated content by implementing watermarks or other means of identifying generated content.

  • Publicly reporting the capabilities and limitations of their systems on a regular basis, including security risks and evidence of bias.

  • Deploying advanced artificial intelligence tools to tackle society’s biggest challenges, like curing cancer and combating climate change.

  • Conducting research on the risks of bias, discrimination and invasion of privacy from the spread of AI tools.

In a statement announcing the agreements, the Biden administration said the companies must ensure that “innovation doesn’t come at the expense of Americans’ rights and safety.”

“Companies that are developing these emerging technologies have a responsibility to ensure their products are safe,” the administration said in a statement.

Brad Smith, the president of Microsoft and one of the executives attending the White House meeting, said his company endorses the voluntary safeguards.

“By moving quickly, the White House’s commitments create a foundation to help ensure the promise of AI stays ahead of its risks,” Mr. Smith said.

Anna Makanju, vice president of global affairs at OpenAI, described the announcement as “part of our ongoing collaboration with governments, civil society organizations and others around the world to advance AI governance.”

For the companies, the standards described Friday serve two purposes: as an effort to forestall, or shape, legislative and regulatory moves with self-policing, and a signal that they are dealing with this new technology thoughtfully and proactively.

But the rules that they agreed upon are largely the lowest common denominator, and can be interpreted differently by every company. For example, the firms are committed to strict cybersecurity around the data and code used to make the “language models” on which generative AI programs are developed. But there is no specificity about what that means—and the companies would have an interest in protecting their intellectual property anyway.

And even the most careful companies are vulnerable. Microsoft, one of the firms attending the White House event with Mr. Biden scrambled last week to counter a Chinese government-organized hack on the private emails of American officials who were dealing with China. It now appears that China stole, or somehow obtained, a “private key” held by Microsoft that is the key to authenticating emails — one of the company’s most closely-guarded pieces of code.

As a result, the agreement is unlikely to slow the efforts to pass legislation and impose regulation on the emerging technology.

Paul Barrett, the deputy director of the Stern Center for Business and Human Rights at New York University, said that more needed to be done to protect against the dangers that artificial intelligence posed to society.

“The voluntary commitments announced today are not enforceable, which is why it’s vital that Congress, together with the White House, promptly crafts legislation requiring transparency, privacy protections, and stepped up research on the wide range of risks posed by generative AI,” Mr. Barrett said in a statement.

European regulators are poised to adopt AI laws later this year, which has prompted many of the companies to encourage US regulations. Several lawmakers have introduced bills that include licensing for AI companies to release their technologies, the creation of a federal agency to oversee the industry, and data privacy requirements. But members of Congress are far from agreement on rules and are racing to educate themselves on the technology.

Lawmakers have been grappling with how to address the ascent of AI technology, with some focused on risks to consumers while others are acutely concerned about falling behind adversaries, particularly China, in the race for dominance in the field.

This week, the House’s select committee on strategic competition with China sent bipartisan letters to US-based venture capital firms, demanding a reckoning over investments they had made in Chinese AI and semiconductor companies. Those letters come on top of months in which a variety of House and Senate panels have been questioning the AI ​​industry’s most influential entrepreneurs and critics to determine what sort of legislative guardrails and incentives Congress ought to be exploring.

Many of those witnesses, including Sam Altman of the San Francisco start-up OpenAI, have implored lawmakers to regulate the AI ​​industry, pointing out the potential for the new technology to cause undue harm. But that regulation has been slow to get underway in Congress, where many lawmakers still struggle to grasp what exactly AI technology is.

In an attempt to improve lawmakers’ understanding, Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the majority leader, began a series of listening sessions for lawmakers this summer, to hear from government officials and experts about the merits and dangers of artificial intelligence across a number of fields.

Mr. Schumer has also prepared an amendment to the Senate’s version of this year’s defense authorization bill to incentivize Pentagon employees to report potential issues with AI tools through a “bug bounty” program, commission a Pentagon report on how to improve AI data sharing, and improve reporting on AI in the financial services industry.

Karoun Demirjian Contributed reporting from Washington.